ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾

A. DISCIPLINARY PROCESS

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾’s student disciplinary process is cumulative, not progressive. This means that a student may receive a serious sanction as a result of their conduct, even if it is a first offense. Multiple or accumulated minor violations will likely result in a more serious sanction than a single underlying violation itself would ordinarily merit. Please see Sanctions for more information.

For information regarding ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾’s policy on reporting matters of student discipline, please see Reporting Student Disciplinary Record and Matters.

For matters involving Title IX, please see the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College Title IX Policy.[1]

Accommodation Statement: Students with disabilities who believe they require a disability-related accommodation for a documented disability in order to participate in a disciplinary proceeding, must contact the Director of Student Accessibility, to request an accommodation.

Any question of interpretation or application of the student disciplinary process shall be referred to the Senior Vice President and Dean for Student Affairs for final determination.

1. Disciplinary Process Overview
   
   The student disciplinary process typically begins with a written statement, such as a security report from the Office of Safety and Security or other written communication, referred to as a “complaint,” from a faculty or staff member to the Office of the Dean of Students, Office of the Dean for Student Affairs, or the Office of the Dean for Academic Affairs.
   
   The Office of the Dean of Students is responsible for the administration of the student disciplinary process and shall review all written complaints. This review may take place in partnership with other College departments as deemed necessary or appropriate by the College. In some instances, the Dean of Students may direct the Office of Safety and Security, or an outside, neutral investigator, to conduct an investigation in order to gather more information before additional action is taken.
   
   After review, a matter will be determined, in the College’s sole discretion, to fall into one of the following categories:
   
   
   1. Minor Violations: Minor violations of the Code of Community Standards (“CCS”) will typically be referred to a Conduct Officer for resolution through an Informal Hearing.
      
      Where a violation includes harm to the community or individual members of the community, in addition to the above processes, a student may also be referred to the Program for Nonviolence and Conflict Resolution.
      
      If the sanctions include a change of status (for example: disciplinary probation), the student may elect to either pursue the appeal process or request the matter be referred to a Formal Hearing, which will typically take place before the Conduct Review Board.
      
      Repeated or multiple minor violations, as defined above, may be treated as “major” violations, as described below.
      
      
   2. Major Violations: Students who commit major violations or who have violated College policy multiple times on separate occasions will typically be referred to a Formal Hearing (see below).
      
      A student charged with a major violation is entitled to a Formal Hearing. The Dean of Students has discretion to determine whether the matter will be heard by a panel from the Conduct Review Board or before a single Presiding Dean.

2. Investigations
   
   Investigations by the Office of Safety and Security, the Office of the Dean of Students, or other College department, or other designee of the College, should be regarded as sensitive and confidential. During an ongoing inquiry, a student may be instructed not to speak with anyone on campus about the investigation in order to preserve the integrity of the process.
   
   
3. Timing
   
   If the Dean of Students determines, in their sole discretion, that, due to the timing of a matter, the Conduct Review Board cannot be convened in a fair or timely manner, the Dean of Students may refer the matter to a Formal Administrative Hearing or defer the case until immediately prior to the start of the next semester. Reasonable exceptions by the College to observe the time limits or other procedural requirements expressed in these procedures shall not constitute an abridgement of the rights of the parties.
   
   
4. Local, State, or Federal Law
   
   College disciplinary proceedings may be initiated with a student charged with a violation of a law, or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, that is also a violation of the CCS without regard to the status of civil or criminal proceedings. The College may conduct disciplinary proceedings prior to, simultaneously with, or after civil or criminal proceedings, including disciplinary proceedings initiated by another institution during a student's study away. The College’s decision to pursue disciplinary proceedings under these circumstances may not be challenged.
   
   
5. Graduation and Revocation of Degree
   
   In no circumstances will the College allow an impending graduation to compromise its disciplinary process. Conferral of a degree may therefore be postponed or deferred, if necessary, until proper resolution of charges. The applicable process, as determined by the College in its sole discretion, will be carried out within a reasonable timeframe. The College reserves the right to revoke a ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ degree if, after a review, the College determines that the degree was awarded as a result of fraud, deceit, or academic dishonesty.
   
   
6. Publication of Precedent
   
   The Office of the Dean of Students will publish aggregate data regarding the charges and outcomes from prior Formal Hearings in a publication of its choice. The reported information should not identify specific individuals and/or participants, except when circumstances warrant release and only as allowed by federal or state law.
   
   
7. Revisions
   
   The student disciplinary process may be amended, in writing, by the President or the President’s designee at any time.
   
   The Office of the Dean of Students, in consultation with the Conduct Review Board and other representatives from the student body, should conduct a review of the conduct codes and their administration on a regular basis. Representatives from the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ Student Government and the Conduct Review Board may recommend policy changes by meeting with the Senior Vice President and Dean for Student Affairs.

B. CONDUCT PROCESSES

Hearings

Unless circumstances require otherwise, the College will conduct all hearings in-person. When it is not possible for a hearing to take place in person or when circumstances require otherwise, for example, in a case involving parties to a No Contact Order, the College will hold a hearing via videoconference. 

1. Informal Hearing Guidelines
   
   For the purposes of assuring fairness and consistency, the College adopts the following protections for students participating in Informal Hearings: notice of the charges and the opportunity to provide a written and/or oral statement prior to resolution of the matter.
   
   The Conduct Officer shall use the decisional standard of “preponderance of evidence” to determine whether a student’s conduct violated College policy.
   
   
2. Formal Hearings
   
   The following section applies to any Formal Hearing, whether occurring before the Conduct Review Board or a single Presiding Dean conducting a formal administrative hearing:
   
   
3.  Initiating a Formal Hearing
   
   In order to initiate a Formal Hearing, the Complaining Witness must submit a written statement or report to the Office of the Dean of Students.
   
   The Complaining Witness must also submit evidentiary support that the Respondent(s) violated the CCS. Evidentiary support may include, but is not limited to, original source material, class syllabus, written instructions or statements, emails, reports, photographs, or video footage.
   
   
   1. Academic Honor Code: When a student is suspected of violating the Academic Honor Code, the person(s) bringing the allegation must first confer with the Office of the Dean of Students, before a Formal Hearing can be initiated. At the faculty member’s written request, the Office of the Dean of Students will refer the matter for a Formal Hearing.
      
      In cases where a student suspects another student(s) of violating the Academic Honor Code, the student is encouraged to bring the information to the attention of the instructor or the Office of the Dean of Students.
      
      
   2. Social Code: A disciplinary review may be initiated through numerous channels, the most common being through a complaint filed directly with the Office of Safety and Security. After an investigation, Safety and Security will refer the matter to the Office of the Dean of Students for review.
      
      
4. Formal Hearing Guidelines
   
   The Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean has discretionary authority to make procedural rulings as necessary to conduct the Formal Hearing within the guidelines of the Code of Community Standards and in the spirit of fairness. This includes but is not limited to decisions on the relevance and/or admissibility of evidence or the participation of witnesses.
   
   The evidentiary and decisional standard in all College disciplinary matters is a “preponderance of evidence.”
   
   Formal evidentiary rules do not apply in College hearings or disciplinary processes; the Conduct Review Board Panel or the Presiding Dean may consider any evidence, such as pertinent records, exhibits, and written statements, it determines relevant and credible.
   
   If a Conduct Review Board Panel or Presiding Dean concludes that a violation has occurred, the Respondent’s previous violations and sanctions in College disciplinary proceedings or related civil or criminal matters may be considered solely for the purpose of recommending appropriate sanctions.
   
   In cases involving more than one Respondent, the College may hold separate hearings for each Respondent or a combined hearing for all Respondents. In cases involving unrelated charges against a single Respondent, the College may conduct separate hearings or a single hearing for the Respondent.
   
   Hearings are confidential and will be conducted in a manner consistent with affording the parties a reasonable degree of privacy.
   
   Hearings may only be recorded by the College. This record becomes the property of ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College with access determined by the Dean of Students. Deliberations will not be recorded.
   
   If the Respondent is found responsible for the charge(s), the Presiding Dean will meet with the Respondent, typically within forty-eight hours of the hearing’s conclusion, and provide the Respondent with a letter outlining the sanction(s), if any.
   
   
5. General Formal Hearing Guidelines for Respondents
   
   For the purposes of assuring fairness and consistency, the College adopts the following protections for students participating in Formal Hearings:
   
   
   1. Pre-Hearing Conference: Respondents must schedule a pre-hearing conference with the Hearing Advisor and their dean to review and discuss rights and responsibilities and hearing procedures.
      
      
   2. Written Notice: Prior to the hearing, the Office of the Dean of Students will provide the Respondent with a written notice outlining the alleged misconduct charges, the time, place, and method (live or virtual) and type of hearing (Conduct Review Board or Administrative Hearing before a Presiding Dean). The Complaining Witness shall also receive notice of the charges and the date, time, and place of the hearing.
      
      
   3. Reasonable Preparation: Respondents must have a reasonable period of time in which to prepare for the hearing. This is generally not less than seven (7) and not more than fifteen (15) calendar days after the written notice. Respondents may request to waive minimum time limits. In matters involving a Complaining Witness who is a student, the parties may request to waive minimum time limits where both parties consent. The Hearing Advisor has the discretion to extend maximum time limits.
      
      
   4. Examination and Submission of Evidence: Prior to the hearing, the Respondent(s) and Complaining Witness(es) may examine all evidence scheduled for review by the Conduct Review Board Panel or Presiding Dean. Evidentiary support may include, but is not limited to, written statements, reports, class notes, or video footage.
      
      After a review of the file, the Respondent may submit a written statement responding to the evidence. Up to four (4) days prior to the hearing, the Respondent may submit any relevant evidence they wish the Conduct Review Board panel or Presiding Dean to consider, including identifying any proposed witness(es) together with a brief description of the issue(s) the witness(es) intends to speak to. Prior to or during the hearing, the Presiding Dean or the Hearing Advisor may determine that proposed evidence, including a witness’s statement, is not relevant and may exclude it. In appropriate circumstances, the Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean may delay or continue the hearing to afford a Respondent sufficient time to respond to the Complaining Witness’s evidentiary support. 
      
      The Complaining Witness may provide responsive information up to two (2) days prior to the hearing.
      
      
   5. Supporter: If Respondents wish, they may have a member of the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ community serve as a Supporter to provide emotional and personal support throughout the Formal Hearing process. However, the Supporter may not actively participate during the hearing. For example, the Supporter may not make statements to the Board or ask questions of any party or witness. The name of this person must be provided to the Hearing Advisor at least four (4) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing. The Supporter may not be a member of the Office of the Dean of Students, Counseling Services, a member of the Conduct Review Board, or a privately retained attorney.
      
      
   6. Character Reference: Respondent may have a single Character Reference speak on their behalf at the hearing or submit a written statement on Respondent’s behalf. Character References should speak to Respondent’s character and provide the context in which they know Respondent. They should refrain from discussing the case at hand unless they have first-hand knowledge, in which case they can participate as a Witness at the appropriate time during the hearing. The Character Reference must be a member of the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ Community but may not be a member of the Office of the Dean of Students, ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ Counseling Services, or a member of the Conduct Review Board. Respondent must provide the name of the Character Witness in writing to the Hearing Advisor at least four (4) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing.
      
      
   7. Impartial Panel: Respondents may request the removal of a single member from the Conduct Review Board Panel, including the Presiding Chair, (names of members are available from the Office of the Dean of Students) that the Respondent believes is incapable of rendering an impartial decision. The request must be made in writing to the Hearing Advisor at least four (4) calendar days prior to the hearing demonstrating a conflict of interest and justifying their request for such removal. The Hearing Advisor will rule on such petitions.
      
      
   8. Procedural Rights During the Hearing: At the hearing, Respondent may, in an orderly fashion, make opening and closing statements, present evidence, respond to questions from the Panel or Presiding Dean, question witnesses through the Presiding Chair or Dean, and hear and question evidence.
      
      
   9. Attendance: Respondents are expected to attend the hearing as scheduled by the Office of the Dean of Students. If a Respondent fails or refuses to appear, the Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean may allow the hearing to proceed in their absence, including presentation of evidence, and the Panel or Presiding Dean will reach decisions based on the evidence presented. 
      
      
   10. Truthfulness: Student participants are expected to be forthcoming and truthful. Failure to be forthcoming and truthful will be a consideration in any sanction and may be judged by the Panel or Presiding Dean to compound the gravity of the original charge(s). Making purposefully misleading and/or false statements, or a failure to be forthcoming and truthful, may result in disciplinary charges leading to a separate hearing.
       
       
   11. Prior Disciplinary History: If the Panel or Presiding Dean concludes that a violation has occurred, it may consider Respondent’s previous violations and sanctions in College disciplinary proceedings or related civil or criminal records when recommending appropriate penalties.
       
       
   12. Attorneys: Attorneys shall not participate in the College’s disciplinary process. If a Student Party has independent and pending state or federal criminal proceedings, their attorney is permitted to attend the Formal Hearing; however, they are limited to advisory status with no opportunities to make statements to the Board or Presiding Dean, raise objections, ask questions, or cross-examine any party, witness and/or other individual participating in the hearing. The Student Party must notify the Hearing Advisor that an attorney will be present at least two (2) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing.
       
       
6. General Expectations of Individuals Involved in Conduct Review Board Hearings
   
   
   1. Witnesses: Witnesses are expected to attend and participate unless excused by the Hearing Advisor. Witnesses are expected to be forthcoming and truthful in their testimony. Making purposefully misleading and/or false statements, or a failure to be forthcoming and truthful, may result in disciplinary charges leading to a separate hearing.
      
      The Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean reserves the right to call a witness(es) not otherwise called by a party, if the witness would assist the understanding of the case, including an Expert Witness. Only the Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean may call an “expert witness.” Professional staff members from ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College’s Counseling and/or Health Services may not serve as witnesses, expert or otherwise.
      
      In limited circumstances, a student may request that a member of Counseling and/or Health Services, with whom they have a clinical/treating relationship, may request their provider to submit a written clinical assessment.
      
      The Hearing Advisor will notify witnesses of the date, time, and place of the Formal Hearing. The Advisor may speak with a Witness to inform them of their role and the expectations of their participation.
      
      
   2. Observers: Supporters, observers, and other individuals present at the Formal Hearing are not allowed to participate actively in the hearing process unless permitted by the Presiding Chair or Dean. All questions and comments must be addressed to the Presiding Chair or Dean.
      
      
   3. Confidentiality: Given the confidential nature of the College’s conduct procedures, except as authorized by the Hearing Advisor, witnesses and other individuals shall not discuss the case with persons not present at the hearing.
      
      Furthermore, Complaining Witnesses, Respondents, witnesses, and other individuals shall not retain, preserve, print, share, or distribute materials from the hearing without the consent of the Dean of Students. Doing so may result in disciplinary charges leading to a separate hearing or administrative action.
      
      
7. Disposition without Hearing
   
   A Respondent who is charged with a major violation of College policy and accepts responsibility for the charges, may request the Dean of Students adjudicate a final disposition of the charges in lieu of a hearing. The request must be made in writing to the Dean of Students not later than two (2) calendar days before the scheduled hearing. If the request for disposition without hearing is accepted, the Dean of Students will assess a sanction appropriate to the acknowledged violation(s). An administrative disposition without hearing is final and may not be appealed. If the Dean of Students determines that disposition without hearing is not in the best interest of the College, the request will be denied, and the case will go forward to a Formal Hearing.
   
   
8. Conduct Involving Multiple Students
   
   For conduct violations involving a large number of students (defined as fifteen (15) or more), who are not otherwise subject to the Group Disciplinary Process, the Office of the Dean of Students will review each individual student’s participation and role, and refer the individual student to the appropriate conduct response as described above. 

C. DEFINITIONS OF PROCEDURAL TERMS

The following procedural definitions apply to all policies contained within of the CCS except the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College Title IX policy. For procedural definitions related to the Title IX policy, please visit the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College Title IX Policy.

• ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College Community: Any current faculty, staff, administrator, or student.
  
  
• Calendar Days: All days on the calendar, including weekends, holidays, recesses, class days, and business days.
  
  
• Character Reference Statement: A written statement made by a current member of the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College community provided during the hearing on behalf of the Respondent.
  
  A Character Reference may not be provided by members of the Office of the Dean of Students, Counseling Services, Health Services, Safety and Security, Conduct Review Board, or a witness or party to the matter. In matters involving Academic Dishonesty, the Character Reference may not be a faculty member (including lab instructors, visiting faculty, and adjunct faculty) from the academic department that originates the complaint.
  
  A Respondent is limited to a single character reference unless otherwise determined by the Presiding Chair.
  
  
• Charge Meeting: The meeting at which a Respondent receives notice of the alleged violations of College policy. Only the Respondent and the Conduct Officer may attend a charge meeting. In the case of a matter that is referred to a Formal Hearing, only the Respondent, Conduct Review Board Advisor, and the Respondent's dean (or dean designee appointed by the Office of the Dean of Students) may attend. Family members and guardians are not permitted to attend.
  
  
• Complaining Witness: An individual representing the office that alleges the violation(s) of the Academic Honor Code or Social Code by the Respondent. Complaining Witnesses must be a member of the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ Community. The Complaining Witness must submit a written complaint and any accompanying evidentiary support. In the event that a Complaining Witness is also a student, the student shall be afforded the rights as outlined in Section 3 General Hearing Guidelines for Student Parties above.
  
  
• Complaint: A written statement or report from a faculty or staff member of the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ community. A complaint may also be a written report from the Office of Safety and Security.
  
  
• Conduct Officer: A professional staff member from either the Office of the Dean of Students or the Office of Residential Life with the authority to address violations of the Code of Community Standards.
  
  
• Conduct Review Board: A fact-finding administrative body, composed of students and faculty, that conducts Formal Hearings involving allegations of student misconduct. The Conduct Review Board determines whether a student is responsible for violating the Code of Community Standards.
  
  
• Conduct Review Board Advisor (Hearing Advisor): The designate of the Office of the Dean of Students who advises the Formal Hearing process, either before the Board or before a single Presiding Dean, and is generally responsible for assuring the fairness and integrity of the hearing process.
  
  
• Dean of Students: The Dean of Students or their designee.
  
  
• Expert Witness: Any individual(s) who has expert knowledge that is relevant to the specific details of the case. The Respondent is entitled to call witnesses, but the Respondent is not entitled to call an Expert Witness. The Presiding Chair reserves the right to call a witness(es) not called by a party if the witness would assist the Board in its work, including an Expert Witness.
  
  
• Formal Hearing: A conduct hearing that typically takes place before the Conduct Review Board and Presiding Dean. In rare or exceptional circumstances, a Formal Hearing may be conducted administratively before a single Presiding Dean who will act as both a finder of fact and the adjudicator of a sanction, if any.
  
  
• Informal Hearing: An informal process to address a disciplinary matter that takes place before a Conduct Officer.
  
  
• Panel: A representative tribunal from the Conduct Review Board.
  
  
• Party or Parties: The Complaining Witness, the Respondent, or Respondents.
  
  
• Presiding Dean: The Dean of Students or designee in their capacity as adjudicator of a Formal Hearing.
  
  
• Respondent: Student(s) responding to the complaint of the alleged violation(s) of the Academic Honor Code or Social Code.
  
  
• Responsibility: A finding of “responsible” means that a student has been determined, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have violated the Academic Honor Code, the Social Code, or other College policy. A finding of responsibility will typically result in the outcome of one or more  sanctions.
  
  
• Sanction: The outcome from an Informal or Formal Hearing if a student is found responsible for violating College policy. One or more sanctions may be imposed. Please see Sanctions for more information.
  
  
• Senior Vice President and Dean for Student Affairs: The Senior Vice President and Dean for Student Affairs or their designee.
  
  
• Supporter: A current member from the ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ College community who serves as a Supporter during a Formal Hearing. A Supporter may not be provided by members of the Office of the Dean of Students, Counseling and Wellness Services, Health Services, Safety and Security, Conduct Review Board, or a witness or party to the matter.
  
  The Supporter may be present with their respective party during the hearing and at related meetings outside the hearing, except for the Charge Meeting. In matters involving Academic Dishonesty, the Supporter may not be a faculty member (including lab instructors, visiting faculty, and adjunct faculty) from the academic department that originates the Complaint. A Supporter may not be a privately retained attorney.
  
  A Supporter may assist their party in preparing for the hearing and provide support throughout the process, from the initiation of a complaint through resolution.  A Supporter may not directly participate in the Formal Hearing nor speak on behalf of their party. They are present to support their party and not to act as legal counsel.
  
  The Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean may disallow a particular Supporter in cases where the Supporter might be a witness or where the Supporter’s presence, in the Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean’s sole determination, would be obstructive to the process.
  
  Parties are limited to a single Supporter unless otherwise determined by the Presiding Chair or Presiding Dean.
  
  
• Witness: Any individual(s) who can attest first-hand to the specific details of the case. The Complaining Witness and the Respondent are permitted to call up to three (3) witnesses each. If a party wishes to call more than three (3) witnesses, they must request permission in writing to the Presiding Dean and the Conduct Review Board Advisor. Witnesses are not permitted to ask questions of, or cross-examine any Complaining Witness, Respondent, Witness, and/or other individual participating in the hearing.
  
  
• Written Notice: Written notice outlining the charges against the Respondent, including the date, time, and place of a hearing, and the method of hearing (live or virtual).

 

[1] Cases of sexual misconduct that may not meet the regulatory definitions set forth in Title IX, may nevertheless violate the Social Code. Such cases will be evaluated and where appropriate, be handled as a Social Code violation. Matters involving ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾ students engaged in misconduct that otherwise meets the definition of “Sexual Harassment” under ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø±¬ÍøÕ¾’s Title IX Policy, but that is excepted from Title IX jurisdiction because of where the conduct occurred, shall be addressed using procedures identical to those set forth in the Title IX Policy.